Pages

30 November 2011

Zotac's GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core Limited Edition Review

Ready for a limited edition graphics card? The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core just landed. Learn how it differs from the GeForce GTX 560 Ti, why its life will be be short, if it's a decent performer, and what we can do with this thing overclocked.

It’s not often that a graphics card manufacturer goes through the trouble of launching a special, limited-run product just for the holiday season. But that’s exactly what Nvidia is doing with its GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core.

Given the name, you might expect this new card to be an unlocked and enhanced version of Nvidia's existing GeForce GTX 560 Ti. But that's simply not so. Recall that the GF114 graphics processor used in the existing GeForce GTX 560 Ti is already unfettered. All of its 384 cores are functional, leaving no disabled hardware to turn on. Rather, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core is equipped with a cut-back GF110.

This GPU was first seen on the company's GeForce GTX 580, slightly handicapped for use in its GeForce GTX 570, and now further trimmed back for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core Specs:

Compared to the GeForce GTX 580, two Streaming Multiprocessors (SM) are disabled; the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core utilizes 14 of the GF110’s 16 available SMs. Each functioning SM has 32 shader cores and four texture units. Five of the six 64-bit ROP partitions are left enabled, each capable of handling eight 32-bit integer pixels per clock cycle.

All told, the card has 448 shader cores, 56 texture units, 40 ROPs, and a 320-bit memory interface. Not surprisingly, its power demands necessitate two six-pin PCIe power cables. And because it's one of Nvidia's higher-end boards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core card supports two-, three-, and four-way SLI through its pair of SLI bridges. You cannot match it up to a standard GeForce GTX 560 Ti card, of course. It'll only cooperate with other 448-core models. So, if you'd like to run in a multi-card configuration, buy these boards at the same time, since they're not expected to remain available.

If this card's specs sound familiar, that's probably because they match Nvidia's now-defunct GeForce GTX 470. You might also notice that the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core is essentially a GeForce GTX 570 with one SM disabled. And speaking of the GeForce GTX 570, the new card has the same 732 core, 1464 MHz shader, and 950 MHz GDDR5 memory frequencies.

Knowing what we know from past reviews on Nvidia's existing cards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core should perform between the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and the GeForce GTX 570. For more information on the company's line-up, check out the following reviews:







GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 CoreGeForce GTX 570
Shader Cores384448448480
Texture Units64565660
Full Color ROPs32404048
Graphics Clock822 MHz607 MHz732 MHz732 MHz
Shader Clock1644 MHz1215 MHz1464 MHz1464 MHz
Memory Clock1002 MHz837 MHz950 MHz950 MHz
GDDR5 Memory1 GB1280 MB1280 MB1280 MB
Memory Interface256-bit320-bit320-bit320-bit
Form FactorDual-slotDual-slotDual-slotDual-slot
Power Connectors2 x 6-pin2 x 6-pin2 x 6-pin2 x 6-pin

Nvidia made it clear to us that its GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core isn’t a replacement for any existing product. A limited supply exists, and it’s exclusive to Asus, Evga, Gainward, Gigabyte, Inno3D, Palit, MSI, and Zotac. This new card is only available in the USA, Canada, the UK, France, Germany, Russia, and the Nordics.

The circumstances of this board's birth are somewhat strange. Perhaps Nvidia has a small collection of GF110 GPUs with two bad SMs, precluding them from use on a GeForce GTX 570. Or, it could simply be a product intended to fill a gap right before the holidays. It could even be a test case of sorts to see if there's a market for something between the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 570.

Pressed for more information, Nvidia let us know that our first two suspicions were dead-on. Like any chip manufacturer Nvidia bins its processors, and it has a number of GF110s with 14 viable SMs. It chose to put them into a limited product to drum up sales over the holiday season, and tah-dah: the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core. No matter how few of these boards end up hitting shelves, though, it'll stand or fall based on its performance per dollar, just like any other graphics card.


Zotac's GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core Limited Edition

There is no official GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Core reference design from Nvidia, so manufacturers modify their own GeForce GTX 570 cards to accommodate the cut-back GPU.
Zotac’s option is based on its GeForce GTX 570 AMP! Edition card. As expected, then, it's 9.5” long (about an inch less than the reference GeForce GTX 570 and about half an inch longer than the reference GeForce GTX 560 Ti). The 448-core card doesn't get the designation of being one of Zotac's AMP! models, but it does feature a slight increase of 33 MHz over the reference 732 MHz core clock spec.





29 November 2011

Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet Review

Lenovo has expanded their successful business-oriented line of computing devices to include tablets. The company introduced two new slates earlier this year – the consumer-oriented IdeaPad K1 and the business-minded ThinkPad Tablet that we are examining today. Sure, Lenovo has been producing Windows-based tablet PCs with touchscreen functions for quite some time, but the ThinkPad tablet isn't any of those.

We've come to know Lenovo as one of the premiere business notebook manufacturers over the past years. Having worked with several ThinkPads during my time at TechSpot, aside from a few small quirks, each unit left me looking forward to the next. The foundation for Lenovo's ThinkPad line has been a uniform style that's stood the test of time quite well. It's simple, practical, recognizable and instills the value of quality in the minds of many. It'll be interesting to see how that tradition has carried on to their first ThinkPad tablet running Android.



Lenovo's ThinkPad Tablet is powered by an Nvidia Tegra 2 dual-core 1GHz processor, 32GB of internal storage, 1GB of DDR2 system memory, front and rear cameras, 8.02.11 b/g/n/ Wi-Fi connectivity and a 10.1-inch WXGA (1280 x 800) IPS display with Corning Gorilla Glass. Our evaluation unit shipped with Android 3.1 Honeycomb and included the optional stylus pen with a retail price of $530. Both 16GB and 64GB variants are also available, priced at $430 and $630, respectively.

Lenovo's Android tablet is ever so slightly larger than the Acer Iconia Tab that we looked at back in August, both in thickness and height; width is virtually identical. According to the official spec sheet, the ThinkPad Tablet measures in at 260.4mm width, 181.7mm depth and 14.5mm thickness. The unit is listed at 742.2 grams with Wi-Fi only and 756.1 grams with a 3G radio.



The first thing you will notice about the tablet is the four buttons across the bottom of the display (when in portrait mode). From left to right, these allow you to lock or unlock auto screen rotation, launch a web browser, go back to the previous page and go home. The buttons are centered along the bezel but they look a bit odd because only two of the buttons are the same size. Additionally the buttons are rather stiff and nothing like the great buttons that Lenovo uses as mouse click buttons on their ThinkPad notebooks. Perhaps the added stiffness was introduced to prevent accidental button presses when using in landscape mode.

After using the tablet for a good while, I wish Lenovo had added a subtle backlight to these buttons as they are next to impossible to read in low light situations. Of course, there are only four buttons and it doesn't take long to memorize their functions, but I digress.

Unlike most tablets on the market, Lenovo's unit looks more natural when held vertically due to the aforementioned buttons across the bottom as well as the Lenovo and ThinkPad branding just above them. The entire front side is solid black with the display slightly inset around a matching bezel. The front-facing 2MP camera and ambient light sensor can be found at the top right side of the bezel.
The quality of the display when powered off appears much higher than what we found on the Acer Iconia. If you recall in that review, the touch panel of the Acer displayed an obvious gridline pattern that looked cheap and was distracting. The grid, while somewhat visible on the Lenovo, isn't nearly as distracting and you really need to be looking for it to see it.




On the left side of the tablet is a single speaker positioned about ¾ of the way down the edge followed by a sliding door that hides a single full-size USB port. Across the bottom we find another door hiding an SD card slot as well as a SIM card slot, a docking connector, a micro-USB connector, mini-HDMI connector and a headphone jack. The docking station connector can be used with Lenovo's optional table dock.

It's worth noting that the door covering the SD and SIM slots is difficult to open without assistance. I had to resort to an Xacto knife to pry the cover open. There's only a tiny horizontal slot to open the cover, meaning you'll need something thin to slide in.
On the right side of the device is a power button and across the top is a volume rocker, microphone and a slot for the optional stylus pen ($40).



Around back we are treated to a smooth plastic surface that almost feels rubber-like. Lenovo's trademark reflective nameplate is positioned on the left with a 5MP camera. The ThinkPad branding is placed on the bottom right corner and the "i" in ThinkPad lights up red when the tablet is in use, just like we saw on the outer lid of the ThinkPad X100e.

Bundled Software
Lenovo has added several of their own widgets and apps to the tablet out of the box. The most prominent is on the home screen called Launch Zone for quick access to email, music, watching videos, reading and the web. The Zones are customizable by tapping the settings button on the left side and you can access tablet-wide settings from the shortcut on the right. Across the bottom of the screen is a conversation bubble icon called App Wheel that when pressed pops up a selection of six different apps which is fully customizable as well.




For the sake of brevity, I'll only highlight a few of the key apps.
Lenovo claims their tablet is the first to come with Netflix preloaded, even though it's a few taps aways for the rest of Android users. Documents to Go is another key addition, an app that normally sells for $14.99 on the Android market. Documents to Go allows you to view, edit and create Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint files as well as view Adobe PDF files and attachments. This is a must-have addition for business use.
Other high-profile apps that don't require an explanation include Angry Birds HD, McAfee Security, Amazon Kindle, YouTube and Amazon MP3. You can see a complete list of preloaded apps in the enclosed photos.




Lenovo also includes an app for their own store called Lenovo App Shop. The company claims their store will eliminate any concerns users might have about downloading suspect apps from Android's market. Apps here are sorted by usefulness so you don't have to wade through a ton of junk apps to find something good.

Again, Lenovo markets this tablet as business-oriented so naturally there are a few apps geared specifically towards IT professionals. The first is Absolute Software's Computrace, which provides a persistent connection back to the device in the event it is lost or stolen. The administrator can freeze the tablet, delete data and perform other management functions remotely, even if the tablet has been factory reset.

Citrix Receiver is an enterprise app that allows IT to securely deliver data and apps directly to the tablet. Furthermore, tablet users can access their work applications and desktops from anywhere.



Lenovo also includes a trial edition of McAfee VirusScan Mobile which includes WaveSecure and SiteAdvisor for Android. The description for this app says it protects your data if your tablet is lost or stolen and can back up and restore information in addition to safeguarding against viruses and spyware. We certainly don't like trial stuff making it into the tablet, but hopefully certain kind of users will find this useful.

Finally, PrintShare allows you to print directly from your tablet to nearby Wi-Fi enabled printers or remote ones shared with PrintShare's software.

Impressions and Conclusion
I tested the rear-facing camera on the ThinkPad under the same conditions that I did with the Acer and received about the same results. Simply put, tablet cameras aren't very good; none of them. You'd have similar or better luck with a basic smartphone camera. Something like Apple's iPhone 4 would easily put these to shame. The same goes for video recording quality – it's just not a high point for the ThinkPad.



Lenovo sent along the optional pen ($40) for our evaluation, which works with the N-Trig DuoSensor digitizer. The first of only a few possible places to use the pen is in the pre-installed Notes Mobile app. This app essentially turns the tablet into a notepad, allowing you to use the pen to take notes or draw directly onscreen. You can elect to keep your dictation as-is or have the app transcribe it into a few different fonts. Icons at the top of the screen control how you write and allow you to undo, redo and erase text.

Unfortunately this app still has a way to go before I'd consider taking it into a meeting. Even when trying to be precise about my handwriting, the app had trouble and got the translation wrong. Furthermore, it would draw lines where my palm rested as I was writing, resulting in undesired lines that would sometimes be translated into random letters. Overall it's a good concept that works fine sometimes but it's not reliable enough to replace a pen and notepad just yet (go figure!). Software updates could change this in the future, however.

Other uses for the pen include drawing apps and editing PDF files but aside from that, the pen likely won't get much use as it's easier to navigate the tablet using your fingers. If you opt to not buy the pen, you're left with a rather odd looking hole in the tablet where the pen would normally be stored.


The ThinkPad Tablet's display operates at the same resolution as the Acer Iconia Tab we tested a few months ago. Both displays showed about the same quality of color reproduction, viewing angles and brightness but the ThinkPad did not have the distracting gridlines of the Acer, especially when using it in direct sunlight.

Although it won't be as big of a concern for business users, one area that Lenovo clearly dropped the ball is audio. The single speaker is positioned on the edge of the tablet where, when holding the unit in portrait mode with my left hand, blocked the port. If that weren't bad enough, the speaker itself is the most underpowered speaker I've ever used on a tablet or notebook. When watching a TV show on Netflix, I could barely hear the audio even when the system was at max volume. During our battery test which consisted of running the movie Inception until the battery died, the Video Player application wouldn't even pick up voices in the film – only occasional loud noises or background music. Things were slightly better in YouTube but not by much. If you plan to listen to music or watch videos on this tab, a set of headphones are virtually a requisite.



One other thing I want to mention is the full-size USB port which is tucked away behind a sliding door. Initially I thought this was a great idea until I tried to use my MSI flash drive with the port. Because the port is tucked so deeply into the tablet, the flash drive wasn't fully able to plug into the port and I couldn't use it (an extension would be a less than ideal solution). One could just blame the flash drive's design but this is the first time I've had a problem with this thumb drive on any system.
To test the battery on the ThinkPad Tablet, I set the screen brightness to roughly 70%, disabled auto-brightness and loaded a 720p rip of Inception for continuous playback until the battery expired. The ThinkPad was good for 5 hours and 42 minutes of usage. In contrast, the iPad 2 lasted 10 hours and 25 minutes under the same test conditions and the Acer Iconia Tab was good for 6 hours and 18 minutes.

Aside from the pen and a few key Lenovo apps and UI changes, the ThinkPad tablet isn't very different than other Tegra 2 Android tablets. Much like I concluded with the Acer Iconia, it's not a bad tablet at all but either the Tegra 2 processor or its combination with Android Honeycomb are showing some age at this point. Apple's iPad 2 is smoother all around, from navigating the web to scrolling through menus and launching apps.

There are things that Android does better than Apple. Connectivity on the ThinkPad Tablet is good, with both an SD card slot and the USB port. There's also the micro USB connector and mini HDMI port, neither of which are found on the iPad.

If you are dead-set on the stylus pen, the ThinkPad Tablet could be the Android tablet for you. If you are an IT professional or a ThinkPad fan, again this could be worth your consideration. But if you can stand to wait a bit longer for Tegra 3, I think the performance benefits of four processing cores, improved graphics and Ice Cream Sandwich will be worth the wait.

source:http://www.techspot.com

Gaming CPU Hierarchy Chart 2011

What about this other CPU that’s not on the list? How do I know if it’s a good deal or not?
This will happen. In fact, it’s guaranteed to happen because availability and prices change quickly. So how do you know if that CPU you have your eye on is a good buy in its price range?
Here is a resource to help you judge if a CPU is a reasonable value or not: the gaming CPU hierarchy chart, which groups CPUs with similar overall gaming performance levels into tiers. The top tier contains the highest-performing gaming CPUs available and gaming performance decreases as you go down the tiers from there.
This hierarchy was originally based on the average performance each CPU achieved in our charts test suite using only four game titles: Crysis, Unreal Tournament 3, World in Conflict, and Supreme Commander. We have since incorporated new game data into our criteria, but it should be known that any specific game title will likely perform differently depending on its unique programming. Some games, for example, will be severely graphics subsystem-limited, while others may react positively to more CPU cores, larger amounts of CPU cache, or even a specific architecture. We also did not have access to every CPU on the market, so some of the CPU performance estimates are based on the numbers similar architectures deliver. Indeed, this hierarchy chart is useful as a general guideline, but certainly not as a one-size-fits-all CPU comparison resource. For that, we recommend you check out our CPU Performance Charts.

You can use this hierarchy to compare the pricing between two processors, to see which one is a better deal, and also to determine if an upgrade is worthwhile. I don’t recommend upgrading your CPU unless the potential replacement is at least three tiers higher. Otherwise, the upgrade is somewhat parallel and you may not notice a worthwhile difference in game performance.

Gaming CPU Hierarchy Chart
IntelAMD
Core i7-2600, -2600K, -2700K, -3820, -3930K, -3960X
Core i7-965, -975 Extreme, -980X Extreme, -990X Extreme
Core i7-980, -970, -960
Core i5-2500, -2500K, -2400, -2320, -2310, -2300

Core i7-860, -870, -875K, -920, -930, -940, -950,
Core i5-750, -760, -2405S, -2400S
Core 2 Extreme QX9775, QX9770, QX9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core i3-2100, -2105, -2120, -2125, -2130
FX-8150
Phenom II X4 Black Edition 980, 975
Core 2 Extreme QX6850, QX6800
Core 2 Quad Q9550, Q9450, Q9400
Core i5-650, -655K, -660, -661, -670, -680
Core i3-2100T, -2120T
Phenom II X6 1100T BE, 1090T BE, 1075T
Phenom II X4 Black Edition 970, 965, 955
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700, Q9300, Q8400, Q6600, Q8300
Core 2 Duo E8600, E8500, E8400, E7600
Core i3 -530, -540, -550
Pentium G860, G850, G840, G630
Phenom II X6 1055T
Phenom II X4 945, 940, 920, 910, 910e, 810
Phenom II X3 Black Edition 720, 740
A8-3850
A6-3650
Athlon II X4 645, 640, 635, 630
Athlon II X3 460, 455, 450, 445, 440, 435
Core 2 Extreme X6800
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Duo E8300, E8200, E8190, E7500, E7400, E6850, E6750
Pentium G620
Celeron G540, G530
Phenom II X4 905e, 805
Phenom II X3 710, 705e
Phenom II X2 565 BE, 560 BE, 555 BE, 550 BE, 545
Phenom X4 9950
Athlon II X4 620, 631
Athlon II X3 425
Core 2 Duo E7200, E6550, E7300, E6540, E6700
Pentium Dual-Core E5700, E5800, E6300, E6500, E6600, E6700
Pentium G9650
Phenom X4 9850, 9750, 9650, 9600
Phenom X3 8850, 8750
Athlon II X2 265, 260, 255
Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Core 2 Duo E4700, E4600, E6600, E4500, E6420
Pentium Dual-Core E5400, E5300, E5200, G620T
Phenom X4 9500, 9550, 9450e, 9350e
Phenom X3 8650, 8600, 8550, 8450e, 8450, 8400, 8250e
A4-3400
Athlon II X2 240, 245, 250
Athlon X2 7850, 7750
Athlon 64 X2 6000+, 5600+
Core 2 Duo E4400, E4300, E6400, E6320
Celeron E3300
Phenom X4 9150e, 9100e
Athlon X2 7550, 7450, 5050e, 4850e/b
Athlon 64 X2 5400+, 5200+, 5000+, 4800+
Core 2 Duo E5500, E6300
Pentium Dual-Core E2220, E2200, E2210
Celeron E3200
Athlon X2 6550, 6500, 4450e/b,
Athlon X2 4600+, 4400+, 4200+, BE-2400
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
Celeron E1600, G440
Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 3800+
Athlon X2 4050e, BE-2300
Pentium Dual-Core E2160, E2140
Celeron E1500, E1400, E1200

Summary

There you have it folks: the best gaming CPUs for the money this month. Now all that’s left to do is to find and purchase them.
Also remember that the stores don’t follow this list. Things will change over the course of the month and you’ll probably have to adapt your buying strategy to deal with fluctuating prices. Good luck!

source:http://www.tomshardware.com

GEIL Corsa EVO Dual Channel 2133Mhz

Introduction

This is GeIL’s latest hardware release, the GeIL EVO-Corsa. These are two high end high profile dual module RAM sticks built for the gamers in mind, with a big 2133MHz of power. This powerful RAM set has been said to be great for all overclocker’s and gamers. So let us take a look shall we at the RAM’s performance.

GeIL EVO Corsa Dual Channel RAM Memory

Here is a quick look at what the DIMM’s actually look like. Both the sticks looks quite cool, not too sure about the colour, but maybe that’s because it didn’t really match the dark colour scheme of the system it was used on.
The GeIL EVO Corsa dual channel ram is set at 1.5V and supports Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P.) for easier RAM manipulation, which makes RAM overclocking much easier. The latency timings are at : 9-11-9-28.

Specification


Testing and Results

Motherboard ASRock Z64 Extreme GEN3
CPU Intel core i7-2600K
RAM GeIL EVO Corsa 2133MHz (2 x 4 GB)
Graphics Card Asus ATi Radeon HD 6970 2GB
Hard Drive Plextor SSD 120 GB
PSU Antec HCG 750w
CPU Cooler Thermolab Trinity

To test the RAM, we use a synthetic benchmarking program called AIDA64. We test the RAM 3 times to make sure everything is working fine, and that there are no random spikes in data. So after 3 times we can conclude those are the correct results.

AIDA64

AIDA64 Extreme Edition is a streamlined Windows diagnostic and benchmarking software for home users. AIDA64 Extreme Edition provides a wide range of features to assist in overclocking, hardware error diagnosis, stress testing, and sensor monitoring. It has unique capabilities to assess the performance of the processor, system memory, and disk drives. AIDA64 is compatible with all current 32-bit and 64-bit Microsoft Windows operating systems, including Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2.



Overclocking

After entering the BIOS and changing the RAM timings by loosening them up slightly we found that the best RAM timings were at 10-11-11-30. We then increased the MHz from stock 2133MHz to large 2203MHz, this was done without changing any voltages from the stock 1.5v. Of course a enthusiast gamer or overclocker may want to overclock this RAM higher, you will need to up the voltages and loosen up the timings even more for that, but RAM lifetime may be shortened quite some. We took it to this point to stay on that borderline safe zone.

AIDA64

AIDA64 Extreme Edition is a streamlined Windows diagnostic and benchmarking software for home users. AIDA64 Extreme Edition provides a wide range of features to assist in overclocking, hardware error diagnosis, stress testing, and sensor monitoring. It has unique capabilities to assess the performance of the processor, system memory, and disk drives. AIDA64 is compatible with all current 32-bit and 64-bit Microsoft Windows operating systems, including Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2.


As you can see the results didn’t changed dramatically, but because of the RAM already being super efficient with its low 1.5v voltage but maintaining to perform outstandingly the RAM can’t be pushed to much higher without losing stability. As mentioned, you will be able to achieve higher overclock’s but at a lifespan cost, as it is with all hardware.


Conclusion

It has been a while since GeIL have steps back into the lime light, but it seems with this super high-end RAM modules, which is just one of their types in the Corsa range; they are staring to bring themselves back. GeIL claimed that this RAM is a great overclocker and is perfect for gamers, we can confirm this is not a lie, the Corsa EVO provides a high clock speed with outstanding performance benchmarks in all Read, Write and Copy, and does this at a low level voltage. As for overclocking capabilities, the clock speed achieved is very high, but didn’t differ to much away from the original stock at 2133MHz, but achieving the 2203MHz clock speed.
The GeIL Corsa EVO 8GB 2133MHz is a great bit of kit to equipped you home unit with, but it doesn’t shadow other RAM modules at this level, it is about the average mark it should be for what it is. However, this should not deter you away from it and choose another brand of RAM, as this is one thing what does shadow the RAM sticks from other brand, and this is the EVO Corsa’s price tag. You can pick up this great set of RAM for a massive bargain price at CCL Online for only £73; the most typical price margins for dual channel 8GB DDR3 RAM would be at least £95 and above. Therefore, I would suggest you think hard about buying the EVO Corsa 8GB 2133MHz. For that reason, we award the RAM as the following.


source:http://www.hardwarelook.com

Sapphire HD 6970 FleX Battlefield 3 Edition Review

Introduction:

It wouldn't be out of line to say that EA's Battlefield 3, released only a couple of weeks ago, was one of the most eagerly anticipated games of the whole year. Almost everyone who has played it, including myself, has fallen in love and has since forgotten about all the other games that they used to play up until its release. I must say that the multiplayer gameplay is phenomenal and offers infinite incentives to keep playing — especially with a good group of teammates. However, that's not the focus of this review; it is merely a small part of it. On the day that Battlefield 3 launched came Sapphire's HD 6970 FleX Battlefield 3 Edition. Now, the only thing that makes it the Battlefield 3 Edition is that retail copies of the card come with a registration key for the game. Of course, the cost of the game is going to be a part of the package, but it still offers incentive to those looking for a new card and were going to purchase the game anyways.
As I've stated in my recent reviews of Sapphire cards, these cards are not anything new at the base/hardware level. Sure, they may come with different coolers, clock speeds, port availabilities, etc., but at the core they are the same. Sapphire has been keeping the market busy with many different varieties of the HD series cards, mainly in the 6800 and 6900 flavors. The HD 6970 is a very powerful card and I thoroughly enjoy my own. I am looking forward to seeing how this card compares to other HD 6970s and seeing how far I can overclock it! In this review, I will provide a thorough evaluation of Sapphire's HD 6970 FleX Battlefield 3 Edition, including its unboxing, exterior and interior evaluation, specifications and features, and OCC's intense testing and benchmarking suite that will put it up against the latest of games and highest of stress levels.

Closer Look:

Covering the package from top to bottom is Battlefield 3 artwork. The front of the box features the same image as everywhere else Battlefield 3 is advertised; an armored soldier walking toward the field of view with a tank and other buildings behind him. All the individual features that the card offers and other specifications are displayed on the front of the box as well. There is an "Overclocked" stamp indicating that it runs at slightly higher speeds than reference clocks, a Dual-Bios icon, and more at the bottom that are general features, such as DX11, HDMI and DisplayPort support, and other AMD features like Eyefinity and CrossFire. The top, bottom, and sides all say "Radeon HD6970 FleX Edition", with the graphics from the front wrapping onto them. The rear of the box mainly goes into detail about the individual features that are listed in icon form on the lower-front of the box, some of which I listed above. Inside of the outer, decorated "sheath" is a plain cardboard box that houses the card and the accessory contents.

 

 
 
 














The card itself is protected inside of a taped-shut, anti-static bag and arrived in good condition. Underneath the recycled cardboard housing for the video card is another cardboard box that contains the accessories. These accessories include: CrossFire bridge, HDMI to DVI adapter, mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort adapter, 6' HDMI cable, driver CD, users manuals, and of course, a Battlefield 3 voucher.
 
 

 

Closer Look:

As with the other special edition Sapphire cards, there is generally no reference to the game/etc that the card represents on the card itself, possibly to protect the zeitgeist of the card and not leave it stuck at a potential date/landmark in time or make it appear gimmicky. As such, the Sapphire HD 6970 FleX Battlefield 3 edition does not have any Battlefield 3 logo or propaganda attached to it physically — it's the fact that it is packaged with the game itself. Anyways, on the top/front of the card we see the AMD logo to the left of the text "Radeon HD 6970" to identify the card. On the other side of the fan is the text "FleX edition", reminding the user of the card's capability to use a combination of three monitors using the two DVI ports and the HDMI port. On non-FleX cards, you cannot use the HDMI port and Single Link DVI port independently. The cooling shroud is composed of black plastic, and offers a neat, rugged look due to its shape, textures, and pattern. Taking a look at the back side of the card will expose the signature blue Sapphire PCB. Nothing particular stands out from the back side, other than the visibility of the PCI slot contacts and the two CrossFire notches at the top. Having two CrossFire notches means that the card is capable of running a triple-card setup.
  

On the mounting bracket side of the card you will find the two DVI ports (Dual Link and Single Link), one HDMI port, and the two DisplayPort jacks. In total, this card is capable of driving five monitors, more than most other cards can handle (at least those without a separate clock generator on the HDMI port). With the amount of ports taking up the majority of the space on the backplate, little room is left for the exhaust vents. Most cards are limited in this way, but do not have any issues with cooling. Peering at the opposite side of the card under the cooling shroud, you can see some of the capacitors on the board, the outside of the power ports (one 2x2-pin plug and one 2x3-pin plug is required), the fan header on the PCB, and some small heatsinks toward the edge of the PCB. You can also see some of the fins on the outside of the heatsink. Rotating to the front side of the card, a good look at the location of the power plugs can be made on the right side, along with the CrossFire plugs on the far left of the card. Similar to other Sapphire offerings in the HD 69x0 line, there is a dual-BIOS switch to the right of the CrossFire area that allows users to switch between different BIOS images, if they require. This is particularly handy because if a BIOS flash goes bad, a user can jump over to the redundant version to resolve the problem.

26 November 2011

Cooler Master Silent Pro Hybrid 1050W Power Supply Review

The worst component to fail in your computer is the power supply in my opinion. Without your power supply, your computer can’t run at all since the motherboard, video card, or CPU won’t get power. This makes consumers very picky of what brand of power supply they choose to purchase from. Usually the wattage isn’t the biggest concern since most brands have a good range for any consumers. The biggest concern is usually the ratings that the power supply gets from customer reviews and tech reviews.

Consumers are attracted to a certain product when there are a good amount of people that rate it well, it has a good warranty system, and isn’t too expensive. Cooler Master is a great company for a wide range of products from cases, mice, heat sinks, fans, power supplies and more. Today we will be looking at a pretty good power supply from them. It’s the Cooler Master Silent Pro Hybrid 1050W power supply. It seems like a normal power supply with the same old components, but there are some exclusive additions that cooler master has made to their power supply that differ from most. Let’s take a look and see what they have to offer.

  • Cooler Master Silent Pro Hybrid 1050W
  • User’s Manual
  • 5.25’’ Fan Controller
  • Cooler Master Cable Pouch
  • M/B 24 Pin connecter
  • CPU 4 + 4 Pins x 2
  • PCI-e 6+2 pins x 6
  • SATA x 12
  • Peripheral 4 pins x 5
  • Floppy 4 pins x 1
  • Fan cable 3 pins x 3


Fan Controller
Before getting to the power supply and all its glory, let’s take a look at this cool fan controller Cooler Master has included with their device. There are two settings on the front, one for Auto and the other for Manual. And the left side has Power Fan Speed while the right side has System Fan Speed. This seems like a neat tool to set the power supply’s fan to a certain speed so it can stay silent like the product name. However, there is only one thing that annoyed me about this controller. The dials on the front face that you turn clockwise or counterclockwise for controlling the speed of the fans is pretty stiff. It takes a good bit of force from my fingers to turn it and there isn’t much space for your fingers since they have curved the front face a bit. I think you have to put some WD-40 in order to loosen it up. Other than that though, I think this is still a great addition to the power supply. It will allow users to lower the speed of the fan if their computer does not generate a lot of heat and keep their computer silent.


23 November 2011

Best SSDs $200 To $300


Best SSDs for ~$205: Performance 120 GB
Adata S511 Series120 GB
Sequential Read550 MB/s
Sequential Write510 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)3.62 W
Power Consumption (Idle).66 W
Choices are pretty limited between $175 and $215. In our opinion, you're better off buying two smaller SSDs or saving up for a more expensive drive like Adata's 120 GB S511. While this drive has received less press than the Vertex 3, it's functionally the same. In our recent SandForce round-up, we gave the 120 GB Vertex 3 our 2011 Recommended Buy award due to better pricing. But Adata dropped its price by $35 since then. As a result, this month's recommendation goes to the 120 GB S511.
Best SSDs for ~$205: Performance Alternative 128 GB
Crucial m4128 GB
Sequential Read415 MB/s
Sequential Write175 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active).150 W
Power Consumption (Idle).085 W
The 128 GB m4 recently got our 2011 Recommended Buy award, which is one of the reasons it makes our list this month. If you prefer something SandForce-based, you still can't go wrong with that previously-mentioned Adata S511 drive.
Based on our Storage Bench v1.0, the 128 GB m4 performs ~44% faster than its 64 GB variant, while only offering 11% less performance than its 256 and 512 GB big brothers. The extra capacity is what you're paying for, sure. But it's good to know that buying up higher in the stack also gives you more speed, too.
Best SSDs for ~$220: Premium Performance Option
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe120 GB
Sequential Read560 MB/s
Sequential Write515 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)3 W
Power Consumption (Idle)1 W
The Patriot Wildfire and Mushkin Chronos Deluxe are two of the fastest 120 GB SSDs that we've ever tested. Both demonstrate what SandForce's newest controller can do when matched up to Toggle Mode flash.
If you're willing to pay a little more per gigabyte to get better performance, both drives come highly recommended. However, the Chronos Deluxe is $60 cheaper than it was last month, while the Wildfire is $20 more expensive, making the former $70 more affordable than the latter. Both drives effectively offer the same real-world performance, which is why Mushkin gets our pick this month.
Best SSDs for ~$275: Reliable Option
Intel SSD 320160 GB
Sequential Read270 MB/s
Sequential Write165 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)0.15 W (Typical)
Power Consumption (Idle)0.1 W (Typical)
Despite our recent piece contending that SSDs aren't necessarily more reliable than hard drives simply because they lack moving parts, we continue to believe that Intel's SSDs are the most reliable. Our opinions are shared by data center managers in the enterprise world, who we interviewed for that story. Almost exclusively, they let us know that they lean on Intel drives.
As such, we recommend Intel's 160 GB SSD 320 for anyone willing to sacrifice the performance of a 6 Gb/s drive in favor of a more mature controller with several new firmware-enabled nods to data security. The ability to map up to one die's worth of failed blocks to redundant flash is one such improvement. Additionally, on-board capacitors keep the drive running for long enough to write cached data to nonvolatile memory in the event of a power loss.
 Best SSDs $110 To $200                                                                                                Best SSDs $300 To $400

source: http://www.tomshardware.com

Best SSDs $110 To $200


Best SSD for ~$115: Performance Boot Drive
Crucial m464 GB
Sequential Read415 MB/s
Sequential Write95 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active).150 W
Power Consumption (Idle).065 W
Even if you aren't planning to upgrade to a SATA 6Gb/s-capable motherboard quite yet, the 64 GB m4 offers good SATA 3Gb/s performance. Of course, it's really designed to plug into third-gen SATA controllers, though, enabling read speeds in excess of 400 MB/s.
We've heard readers complain that SSDs based on SandForce's technology are affected by performance degradation when they're forced to operate on incompressible data. That's mostly an issue for folks moving lots of media-oriented information or employing a form of active encryption, such as TrueCrypt. The behavior of Crucial's drive doesn't change based on the data it handles.
Best SSDs for ~$150: Single-Drive Configuration
Corsair Force 390 GB
Sequential Read550 MB/s
Sequential Write500 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)3.6 W
Power Consumption (Idle)0.05 W
The price on 90 GB second-gen SandForce SSDs dropped since last month. If you want to use your SSD for more than simply installing an operating system and a few apps, the 90 GB capacity point is your next stop.
At $150, OCZ's 90 GB Agility 3 and Corsair's Force 3 are excellent choices. Both drives employ asynchronous memory, so real-world performance is near identical. We pick the latter simply because it's available for $150 through our PriceGrabber shopping engine, while the Agility is listed for $165. In reality, either drive is a great choice.
Best SSDs for ~$180: Single-Drive Configuration
OCZ Agility 3120 GB
Sequential Read525 MB/s
Sequential Write500 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)2.0 W
Power Consumption (Idle)0.5 W
There are some decent deals for 120 GB second-gen SandForce SSDs right around $180. Everything in this range still centers on asynchronous flash memory, but it's hard to beat the price per gigabyte and performance offered by these drives.
Be aware that 120 GB first-gen SandForce SSDs are also being sold in this price range, so you need to make sure that you're purchasing second-gen SandForce hardware if you really want a good deal on elevated performance.
Mobile Users: Honorable Mention for $190: System Drive (OS + Programs)
Intel SSD 310 (mSATA)80 GB
Sequential Read200 MB/s
Sequential Write70 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)0.15 W
Power Consumption (Idle)0.075 W

The 40 GB SSD 310 only uses half of its available NAND channels, and it costs too much to be a value contender in the desktop space. The performance of the 80 GB model feels much closer to the X25-V in a much smaller form factor. If our recommendation was based on price alone, this wouldn't make our list. But mSATA lets you keep your notebook's high-capacity SATA-based hard drive too, which means you get the best of both worlds.

Best SSDs $110 And Under                                                                                             Best SSDs $200 To $300

source: http://www.tomshardware.com